3 minute read

A controversial seven-tackle set from a missed field goal attempt has reignited debate after Penrith’s golden-point win over the Dolphins.

Fans have again questioned the application of the seven-tackle set rule after Penrith Panthers edged the Dolphins 23-22 in golden point on Friday night.

Nathan Cleary sealed the result with a decisive field goal, completing a comeback after Penrith had surrendered an 18-0 lead. However, the match's closing stages have reignited debate over how the rule is applied in attacking situations.

The turning point came when Isaiya Katoa attempted a field goal that travelled over the dead-ball line. Under current rules, this resulted in a seven-tackle set for Penrith, rather than the standard six, allowing them to gain valuable field position.

Penrith used the extra possession to move into range. Cleary's first field goal attempt was charged down, but the Panthers retained control and, after another set, he converted the match-winner.

The rule was originally introduced by the National Rugby League to discourage teams from deliberately kicking the ball dead to reset defensive lines from a 20-metre restart.

It aimed to prevent sides from neutralising attacking returns by conceding territory in a controlled way.

Adjustments were made in 2026, removing the seven-tackle restart when an attacking player accidentally grounds the ball dead while attempting to score. However, the same exemption does not apply to missed field goal attempts, which remains a point of contention.

The issue had already been raised earlier this season by Johnathan Thurston, who questioned the fairness of penalising teams for attempting match-winning plays.

Speaking on Channel 9, he argued that sides should not be disadvantaged when actively trying to win in golden point.

Fan reaction on social media during Friday's match echoed that sentiment, with many describing the rule as inconsistent and calling for further refinement.