3 minute read

Xavier Willison’s standout form has sparked Origin calls, but eligibility rules keep him out of contention.

Xavier Willison's strong early-season form has prompted fresh State of Origin discussion, but the Brisbane forward remains ineligible for Queensland despite recent rule changes.

The 23-year-old impressed in the Broncos' 32-12 win over the Bulldogs, scoring a try and running for 170 metres, along with four tackle breaks and a line break. He also played 75 minutes in the absence of key forwards Payne Haas, Pat Carrigan and Corey Jensen, underlining his growing influence in the pack.

Willison's performances have fuelled speculation about an Origin call-up, particularly after the NRL updated eligibility rules to allow players who have represented Tier-1 nations such as New Zealand and England to feature in the series. Willison played two Tests for New Zealand last year, which no longer automatically excludes him.

However, the age-based residency rule remains decisive. Players must have lived in New South Wales or Queensland before their 13th birthday to qualify. Willison did not move to Australia until he was 15, ruling him out of Origin selection.

The same restriction applies to Dolphins centre Herbie Farnworth, who arrived from England after turning 13. While the revised rules have broadened eligibility in some areas, the age cutoff continues to limit access for players developed overseas.

Several players have benefited from the changes. Addin Fonua-Blake, Casey McLean and Victor Radley are now eligible for NSW, while Briton Nikora qualifies for Queensland. Kalyn Ponga can also continue representing the Maroons despite switching his international allegiance to New Zealand. Jahrome Hughes technically qualifies for Queensland but has opted out, stating he lacks the desire to play Origin.

Meanwhile, debate continues around Penrith prop Moses Leota, who missed the residency cutoff by four months. NSW officials are reportedly seeking an exemption, though former players Andrew Johns and Billy Slater have argued the rule should remain fixed. Both indicated that making exceptions would create uncertainty over where eligibility boundaries should be drawn.